tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3931921496989071942.post5369253784667582461..comments2023-06-08T07:32:39.725-05:00Comments on Aristotle's Feminist Subject: 16 stupid biblical attempts at description: Anne CarsonJ. K. Gaylehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07600312868663460988noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3931921496989071942.post-30490480398430145542011-03-15T09:22:37.154-05:002011-03-15T09:22:37.154-05:00Katherine! Katherine!
Yay, blogger kept your comm...Katherine! Katherine!<br /><br />Yay, blogger kept your comment this time. And what a wonderful comment on time you've made. Love how you see our works "within time" that "still has spark... and S/pritedness." (What a concept, time. How do we mark it, or measure it? Like the ancient Greeks with their water clocks, the old Romans with their sun dials, the Lombardy monks' hour glasses, the precise analog Swiss watches, the perfect digital atomic clocks, our improving mechanisms for determining time just leave us with more questions. Isn't it relative, Einstein would say. But if modifiable by "unexhausted" and still by just "a fragment" of that, then what, you say. Thank you!)J. K. Gaylehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07600312868663460988noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3931921496989071942.post-36360410676828762472011-03-15T07:58:17.524-05:002011-03-15T07:58:17.524-05:00testing? testing?
I really like that phrase "...testing? testing?<br /><br />I really like that phrase "a fragment of unexhausted time". What an interesting way to describe time. It makes me think about certain old works that are described as "timeless", which never makes sense to me since all the works of humans occur within time. But I suppose it is more that their timeliness has not been exhausted-it still has spark and energy, liveliness and S/spiritedness.Katherinehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00574613265955035061noreply@blogger.com