Like Aristotle, people today who blame victims seem unable to grasp that a person, though free, can nevertheless be so oppressed by adversity that she accepts her servitude, her oppression. In other words, victim-blaming, while ostensibly affirming the freedom of victims to reject their condition, in fact denies freedom by attributing to victims an inherent flaw namely Aristotle’s weakness of will, or more contemporaneously, lack of will power. Thus, the allegation of akrasia enables the one who blames the victim to deny the terrible reality that only the free can be, and are, enslaved or otherwise victimized. If one has an inherent flaw, then to that extent one is not free.
--Marilyn Nissim-Sabat, Ph.D., LCSW,
“Toward a Visionary Politics,”
3 comments:
But JK, don't you know that Aristotle was absolutely essential to Thomas Aquinas and that we need to go back and live in the past and recover Thomism to rescue the world from Dons Scotus? :-)
Right, Rod, LOL. Three guys walk into a bar... that's correct: Aristotle, Aquinas, and Dons Scotus. Was it the White Elephant Saloon, in Fort Worth, where they met Mabel Harlow, before the brawl broke out? Or duking it out in the little back room of a big Cathedral somewhere? (One thing's for sure: you won't find these three at the women's shelter, or the homeless shelter, or the AlAnon meeting, or at any stop on the underground railroad, where Others were born to be. -- oh, and diff topic: though I'm not really the blogger JK on fb, feel free to call me Kurk as you like just about anywhere.)
Time for us all to wake up and smell the intimidation, stop asking why victims stay, and start asking perpetrators why they victimize in the first place.
Post a Comment